PREAMBLE
However, of late, the number of the
programmes had increased and while some of the
programmes provided for administrative costs of the
DRDAs, others did not. There was no uniformity among
the different programmes with reference to
administrative costs. Keeping in view the need for an effective agency at the
district level to coordinate the anti-poverty effort, a new Centrally Sponsored
Scheme for strengthening the DRDAs has been
introduced with effect from
I - Role and Functions of the District Rural
Development Agency
1.1 If effective
programme design is critical to successful
implementation of rural development programmes, so
is an effective delivery agency. None of the anti-poverty
programmes can have impact unless they are implemented with clarity of
purpose and a commitment to the task. It is here that the
DRDAs play a critical role. The DRDAs are not
the implementation through overseeing the implementation of different
programmes and ensuring that necessary linkages are
provided. To this extent the DRDA is a supporting and facilitation organization
and needs to play a very effective role as a catalyst in development process.
1.2 The district Rural Development Agency is
visualised as specialized and a professional agency
capable of managing the anti-poverty programmes of
the Ministry of Rural Development on the one hand and to effectively relate
these to the overall effort of poverty eradication in the District. In other
words, while the DRDA will continue to watch over and ensure effective
utilization of the funds intended for anti-poverty
programmes, it will need to develop a far greater understanding of the
processes necessary for poverty alleviation/eradication. It will also need to
develop the capacity to build synergies among different agencies involved for
the most effective results. It will therefore need to develop distinctive
capabilities rather than perform tasks that are legitimately in the domain of
the PRIs or the line departments. The role of the
DRDA will therefore be distinct from all the other agencies, including the
Zilla Parishad.
1.3 DRDAs must
themselves be more professional and should be able to interact effectively with
various other agencies. They are expected to coordinate with the line
department, the Panchayati Raj
Institutions, the banks and other financial institutions, resources required for
poverty reduction effort in the district. It shall be their
endeavour and objective to secure inter-sectoral
and inter-departmental coordination and cooperation for reducing poverty in the
district. It is their ability to coordinate and bring about a convergence of
approach among different agencies for poverty alleviation and would set them
apart.
1.4 The DRDAs are
expected to coordinate effectively with the Panchayati
Raj Instutions. Under no
circumstances will they perform functions of PRIs.
1.6 The DRDAs are
expected to oversee the implementation of different anti-poverty
programmes of the Ministry of Rural Development in
the district. This is not be confused with actual implementation, which will be
by the Panchayati Raj
and other Institutions. The DRDAs will monitor
closely the implementation through obtaining of periodic reports as well as
frequent field visits. The purpose of the visit should be to facilitate the
implementing agencies in improving implementation process, besides ensuring that
the quality of implementation of programmes is high.
This would include overseeing whether the intended beneficiaries are receiving
the benefits under the different programmes.
1.7 The
DRDAs shall keep the Zella
Parishad, the State and Central Government duly
informed of the progress of the implementation of the
progremmes through periodic reports in the prescribed formats. Special
report, as and when called for, shall be provided.
1.8 It shall be the duty of the
DRDAs to oversee and ensure that the benefits
specifically earmarked for certain target groups (SC/ST, women and disabled)
reach them. They shall all necessary steps to achieve the prescribed norms.
1.9 The
DRDAs shall take necessary step to improve the awareness regarding rural
development and poverty alleviation particularly among the rural poor. This
would involve issues of poverty, the opportunities available to the rural poor
and generally infusing a sense of confidence in their ability to overcome
poverty. It would also involve sensitizing the different functionaries in the
district to the different aspects of poverty and poverty alleviation
programmes.
1.10 The
DRDAs will strive to promote transparency in the implementation of
different anti-poverty programmes. Towards this end,
they shall publish periodically, the details of the different
programmes and their implementation.
1.11 Keeping in view, the
substantial investment that are being made in poverty alleviation
programmes, the DRDAs
shall ensure financial discipline in respect of the funds received by them,
whether from Central of State Governments. They shall also ensure that the
accounts are properly maintained including in respect of the funds allocated to
banks or implementing agencies in accordance with the guidelines of different
programmes.
1.12 Thus the role of the DRDA is
in terms of planning for effective implementation of anti-poverty
programmes; coordinating with other
agencies-Governmental, non-Governmental, technical and financial for successful
programme implementation; enabling the community and
the rural poor to participate in the decision marking process, overseeing the
implementation to ensure adherence to guidelines, quality, equity and
efficiency; reporting to the prescribed authorities on the implementation; and
promoting transparency in decision making and implementation.
1.13 In addition the
DRDAs shall coordinate and oversee the conduct of
the BPL Census and such other surveys that are required from time to time.
1.14 The
DRDAs shall also carry out / aid in carring
out action research/ or evaluation studies that are initiated by the
Central/State Governments.
II - Organisational
Structure of the DRDAs
2.1
Each district will have its own District Rural Development
Agency. Ordinarily it would be a society registered under a Societies
Registration Act. In respect of such states where DRDA does not have a separate
identity a separate cell should be created in Zill
Parishad which maintains a separate identity and
separate accounts, so that the accounts are capable of being audited separately.
This Cell should be directly under the charge of CEO or alternatively an officer
who has the qualifications to be a Project Director. The accounts of
DRDAs should under no circumstances be merged or
amalgamated with those of the Zilla
Parishads.
2.2
In order to be effective, the DRDA must have an appropriate
staffing structure as well as suitable personnel policy. Keeping in view the
rule and functions of the DRDA listed in the previous chapter, the staffing
structure of DRDA must include positions for Planning for poverty alleviation,
Project formulation, Social Organization and Capacity
builing , Gender concerns, Engineering Supervision and Quality control,
Project Monitoring, Accountancy and Audit functions as well as Evaluation and
impact studies. An indicative staffing structure is given in Annexure and is
also detailed below. The State Government may modify the structure suitably, but
without altering the basic design, to take care of the needs of individual
districts keeping in view their size as well as specificity. However, this will
also be subject to the overall ceiling of administrative costs admissible to the
DRDAs in the State. By and large the staff appointed
should be dedicated to DRDA-related works and should not be frequently
transferred.
The Staffing structure will as follows:
i)
Each DRDA should be headed by Project Director, who should be the rank of
a Additional District Magistrate. The Project
Director should preferably be a senior scale officer of All India Services or a
senior officer of the State Service, eligible of appointment to the All India
Services. He would be in overall charge of the
activities of the DRDA and responsible for interaction with the District/State
administration as well as with the Government of India. The PD should be
exclusively for DRDA work.
ii)
In some State, such as
iii)
Each DRDA should have the following wings:
a)
Self - employment Wing;
b)
Women's wing;
c)
Wage employment wing;
d)
Engineering wing;
e)
Account wing;
f)
Monitoring and Evaluation wing;
g)
General Administration wing;
b) Self- Employment Wing
i)
The self-employment Wing, shall be headed by a Project Officer and
should have APOs in the field of planning, social
mobilization, credit and Technology. The Project Officer may be specifically
responsible for any of these four functions. The
ii)
The DRDAs would be drawing up projects for
specific activities under the Self-employment programmes,
it would be necessary to have suitable experts to oversee the successful
implementation of such projects. As part of the overall
programme management, the DRDAs may take
outside expert on a consultancy basis. Secretary, Rural Development of each
state should develop guidelines for selection of consultants so as to avoid any
wrong use of such provisions and to see that only those
who have a proven practical expertise are engaged. Such experts to be engaged on
project specific basis will function under the overall control and supervision
of the Project Officer, self-employment programms.
c) Women's Wing
In order to ensure that women
receive adequate attention in all the anti- poverty
programmes, a Women's Cell should be sit up in each DRDA. This cell would
establish necessaty synergy with departments such as
Women & Child Development, Education and health Departments to ensure that women
not only receive their due share in the anti-poverty
programmes but are also able to receive benefits of other
programmes. The Women's wing will be headed by an
Assistant Project Officer, who will function under the overall co-ordination of
the Project Officer of the self employment wing. Assistant
d) Wage Employment Wing
The central concern of the DRDA in
the wage-employment programmes should relate to
planning, monitoring and vigilance by a technical wing. The DRDA should not
concern itself with the actual implementation and execution of works which can
be done by the line department / engineers or the
Panchayati Raj Institutions. At the same
time, the magnitude of the wage employment wing, with a Project officer assisted
by a small complement of staff.
e) Watershed Wing
A Watershed Wing will be set up in the
DRDA in all such districts where IWDP / DPAP /DDP is in operation. This wing
should consist of a Project Officer, assisted by a small complement of staff.
This staff would be independent of the programme
support in the form of PIAs or Watershed committees.
f) Engineering Wing
Each DRDA should have a technical
wing, which should also be responsible for innovations in design or use of
materials, as well as training of the engineering personnel of the line
departments or the PRIs. This wing should be manned
by an Executive Engineer assisted by one or two Assistant / Junior Engineers.
g) Account Wing
i)
Wherever it has not been done, the DRDAs should
shift over to commercial accounting systems from the existing government account
system. They should publish an annual report alongwith
the balance sheet. The accounts wing of the DRDA should be headed by a Sr.
Accounts Officer, either on deputation or by engaging the services of a
chartered accountant. He should be supported by an Accounts Officer each for
self-employment programmes and wage employment
programmes duly assisted by accountants. Wherever
the Watershed programmes (IWDP/DPAP/DDP) are under
implementation, an additional post of Accounts Officer may be sanctioned. For
Indira Awaas
Yojana, one Accountant at the district level should
be available to monitor the progress of the programme
and the accounts.
ii) One of the Accounts Officers should
perform the role of internal audit.
h) Monitoring Wing
These should be a separate Monitoring
and Evaluation wing headed by a Project Economist and functioning directly under
the supervision of the Project Director. Apart from monitoring the progress of
all the programmes., this wing should also carry out
evaluation /impact studies regularly by independent by independent institutions
/experts including NGOs. The cost of such studies will be met from the
respective programme funds. This wing should also
monitor issues relevant to poverty in the district.
III – Administrative Costs
3.1 Administrative costs were
earlier admissible under different programmes. In
order to enable the DRDAs to develop a proper
personnel structure and to ensure its proper growth over years, the
practive of meeting the administrative costs as
percentages of each programme allocation has been
given up. It will, on the other hand, be taken up as a new scheme called `DRDA
Administration with effect from
3.2 Till 31.3.1999,
administrative costs of the DRDAs were being met by
way of a part of the programme fund of IRDP, JRY,
EAS, DPAP, etc. With the introduction of the scheme of `DRDA Administration` the
administrative costs earlier available under different
programmes stand withdrawn from 1.4.1999 and provision of administrative
support to the DRDAs will be only under the scheme
of `DRDA Administration`.
3.3 Since the salary structure
in different States different, the States may follow their own salary structure.
However, the administrative cost ceiling fixed should be met entirely by the
State government.
3.4 A maximum of 30% of the
salary cost may be allocated towards contingencies inclusive of Rents, POL,
office expenses, etc.
3.5 The administrative cost per
district is fixed as follows:
Category A districts (<6
blocks) Rs. 46 lakh
per year
Category B
districts (6-10 blocks) Rs. 57
lakh per year
Category C
districts (11-15 blocks) Rs. 65
lakh per year
Category D
districts (>15 blocks) Rs. 67
lakh per year
3.6 The above limits will be
applicable from the year 1999-2000. This ceiling will be raised every year, on a
compounding basis, upto 5% to set off the increases
due to inflation etc.
3.7 The state governments are
allowed a sum upto 10% of the above costs, to be
calculated at 10% of the total admissible cost to all the districts in the
state.
IV – Personnel Policy of the
DRDAs
4.1 Currently, there is no
uniform policy for engaging and/or recruiting the staff by the DRDA. In many
States, there are staff both directly recruited as
well as on deputation. It is essential that prudent personnel policies are
followed if the DRDA are to be a professional agency or are to perform the tasks
expected of them. The following principles are laid down which must necessarily
be followed.
4.2 As a matter of policy, the
DRDA should not have any permanent staff. Taking employees on deputation to the
DRDA for specific periods has the advantage of better choice of staff,
flexibility in staffing pattern and of motivating the staff. The objective of
strengthening of DRDAs is to provide them with
certain professional capacity and have a flexible-standing pattern. To start
with, DRDAs shall no longer be allowed to make any
direct recruitment. In respect of the Staff that is currently borne on the DRDA,
the State Rural Development Department should immediately draw up a 3-5 year
plan for absorption of the staff into the line departments.
4.3 The Project Directors,
Project Officers, APOs and all technical posts are
to be manned by officer with proven capability and motivation and are selected
in an objective manner by specific Selection Committees. The Project Directors
should be selected by a Committee headed by the Chief Secretary / Development
Commissioner / Addl. Chief Secretary of the State and with the Secretary (RD)
being the member convenor, similarly, for officers
at the level of APOs and other technical officers,
there should be a selection Committee headed by Secretary (RD). For other staff
too, other than ministerial and lower rank, the selection should be by an
appropriate selection committee.
4.4 In the selection of Project
Directors and APOs, emphasis should be on selecting
officers of young age. Indicatively, the PDs and
4.5 Lack of sufficient length of
tenure to the project personnel has been a worrisome factor in the
implementation of the anti-poverty programmes. In
order to avoid this risk, it is necessary to insist on a minimum tenure and also
ensure its compliance. The Project Directors, APOs
and other technical staff must have a minimum tenure of 2-3 years and only under
exceptional circumstances can theyh be shifted that
too after recording the specific reasons in writing. Any violation should mean
suspension of funds to the concerned DRDA.
4.6 The Secretary, Rural
Development of the state should be in overall charge of the Project Directors of
DRDAs. To start with, after selection the posting
orders of Project Directors (the project officers, APOs)
should be issued by the Secretary, Rural Development and not by any other
department. The cadre controlling authority of the Project Directors / other
officers may place the services of the concerned officers (after selection) at
the disposal of the Rural Development Department for appointment to the
concerned posts. The Secretary, Rural Development should also be responsible for
making incharge arrangements when Project Directors
go on long leave. The Secretary, Rural Development should actively associate
himself / herself in the training requirements of Project Directors and other
DRDA staff.
4.7 In order to make the DRDA a
professional body, the officials and staff of DRDAs
should be constantly trained in the general field of management of rural areas
and poverty. The personnel to be posted to the DRDA should be given a
pre-service training to orient them suitably to their tasks.
4.8 There should also be a
system of an annual in-service training where the officers could be given the
updates about the relevant fields and which would also afford them an
opportunity of exchanging their experiences.
4.9 Suitable training
programmes will be designed by the Ministry in
consultation with professional institutes of the national importance. The State
Government may also identify suitable state-level institutions in consultation
with the Ministry of Rural Development.
5.1 An indicated, the role of
the DRDA is to perform tasks which are distinctly different from other
institutions / departments. However, the DRDAs are
very much a part of the district. They shall function accordingly.
5.2 The DRDA shall be a
registered society registered under a Societies Registration Act or a district
cell in the Zilla Parishad
having a separate identity. The chairman of the Zilla
Parishad shall be the chairman of governing body of
the DRDA. The Executive and financial functions shall however lie with CEO,
Zilla Parishad /
District Collector who shall be designated as the Chief Executive Officer or
Executive Director. It shall be his responsibility to ensure that the
administration of DRDA and the programmes are
conducted in accordance with the guidelines. Wherever the
Zilla Parishads are not in existence or are
not functional, the DRDAs would function under the
Collector / District Magistrate /Deputy Commissioner of the District, as the
case may be.
5.3 The administration of the
DRDA shall be carried out by a governing body. The Governing Body of the DRDA
will provide policy directions, approve the annual plan and also review and
monitor the implementation of the plan, including the different
programmes. They shall give such directions to the
DRDA as may be necessary from time to time. The Governing Body of the DRDA will
meet once in a quarter.
5.4 The composition of the
governing body shall be as follows.
1. Chairman of
Zilla Parishad
Chairman
2. All MPs and
MLAs and MLCs of the
District
3. 1/3rd of
Panchayat Samiti
Chairpersons to be nominated by rotation in alphabetical order for a tenure of
one year, one of whom must belong to SC/ST and another a
woman.
4. CEO of Zilla
Parishad / District Collector – Chief Executive
Officer / Executive Director
5. Head of the Central
Cooperative Bank of the District
6. Chairman Regional Rural Bank
7. District Lead Bank Officer
8. Representative of the
Reserve Bank of
9. NABARD representative at
district level
10. General Manager, DIC
11. Representative of KVIB
12. District Officer in charge of Scheduled
Caste / Scheduled Tribe Welfare
13. District women & Child welfare officer
14. District officer dealing with welfare of
the disabled
15. One representative from
technical institutions
16. Two representatives of NGOs
17. Two representatives of the weaker
sections, one of whom may be drawn from SCs and
STs
18. One representative of rural
women
19. Proejct
Director, DRDA - Member Secretary
Wherever the
Zilla Parishads are not
in existence, the State Governments may nominate elected members of the State
Legislature from the concerned districts to act as Chairman of the Governing
Bodies of the DRDAs.
Executive Committee (EC)
5.5 All executive and financial
powers of the DRDA shall be exercised by the executive committee as per a scheme
of delegation of financial and executive powers to be determined by each
State/UT Government and this Committee will be fully accountable in all matters
of DRDA to the governing body as well as to the Government. The Executive
Committee of DRDA shall be headed by the Chief Executive Officer / Executive
Director and shall consist of all the District level officers and any other
officer deemed necessary for planning and implementation of the anti-poverty
programmes. The Project Director DRDA will be the
Member-Secretary of the EC.
The Executive Committee will meet at
least once in a month.
VI – Financial Procedures
6.1 The scheme of `DRDA
Administration` shall be a centrally sponsored scheme. The funds required under
this progreamme shall be shared between the
Centre and the States in the ratio of 75:25 Funds
will be released directly to the DRDAs, in
accordance with the guidelines under this programme.
6.2 The
Centre will release funds in two installments.
a) Release of First Installment
i)
The release of first installment can be made without any formal request if the
second installment in the previous year had been released without any condition.
If latter installment was not released at all or was released with some
conditions, formal requests for release of first installment are required from
the DRDAs after the conditions have been fulfilled /
reasons for non-release of the second installment have been met. For the first
year i.e., 1999-2000 all the DRDAs will be released
first installment on an ad-hoc basis.
ii) The release of the first
installment should ordinarily be completed by the end of the second month of the
financial year.
b) Release of Second Installment
i)
The quantum of the second installment shall be subject to actual requirement
within the overall ceiling. The second installment of Central funds shall be
released on the request of the DRDAs in the
prescribed performa on fulfillment of the following
conditions.
1) Budget provision for the
current year may be indicated by the State Governments. The Central release will
not exceed it proportionately.
2) The State Government should
have released its contribution during the previous year. Deficiency in release
of its share will be deducted from the second installment. Also the contribution
of the State Government for the first current year should have been released.
3) Available funds including carry forward
funds should have been utilized at least to 60%.
4) The opening balance of the
DRDAs should not exceed 15% of the allocation of the
year in which funds are being released. In case, the opening balance exceeds
this limit, the Central share of the amount by which it exceeds this limit will
be deducted at the time of release of second installment.
5) Audit reports, utilization
certificates for the previous year should be furnished. This will not be
required in the first year i.e., 1999-2000.
6) Any other terms and
conditions imposed at the time of the last release should have been met.
ii) The DRDA shall maintain
the fund under the head `DRDA Administration`, in a separate bank account in any
o the nationalized bank. Interest earned on the funds will necessarily be used
only for admissible items of expenditure under DRDA administration. They shall
not be used for any programme funding or
non-admissible items of expenditure, such as construction of building and
purchase of vehicles.
c) Maintenance of Accounts
i)
Principles
Separate accounts shall be maintained of this
scheme and each other scheme under which the DRDA receives funds. Such
maintenance of accounts is governed by the principles that the expenditure
incurred is not repugnant to the objective of the scheme and is made, in
accordance with the prescribed procedures. DRDA accounts are to be maintained on
double entry system. The accounting procedure for DRDAs
has been described in detail in the Government of India, Ministry of Rural
Development Publication entitled “Revised Accounting Procedure for District
Rural Development Agencies / Societies”, 1984 and subsequent instruction issued
/ to be issued from time to time. Internal Audit Cells should be specifically
charged with the responsibility of overseeing and the observance of these
principles. One of the Accounts Officers should perform the role of internal
audit.
d) Audit of the Accounts
i)
The Project Director should cause the annual accounts of the DRDA to be prepared
by a date not later than 30th June comprising Receipt and Payment
Accounts, Income and Expenditure Account and Balance sheet. After approval by
the Governing body, he shall have the accounts audited by the Chartered
Accountant or any other auditor appointed for the purpose. A copy of such audit
report (duly signed by auditor) alongwith the annual
statement of accounts certified by the auditor and the Chairman of the DRDA
thereon should be furnished simultaneously to Government of India and the State
Government not later than 30th September.
ii) The Comptroller and
Auditor General (CAG) has the right to conduct the audit of the accounts of the
society and for this purpose shall have the right of access to the books of
accounts and other relevant records of the DRDA. For this purpose a copy of the
annual accounts alongwith the audit report and the
comments of the DRDA thereon shall be sent to the audit office nominated by CAG.
iii) The accounts of the DRDA
shall also be open to inspection by such individual or parties as are nominated
to carryout such inspections by the Ministry of Rural Development at the State
level or at the level of the Government of India. All Officers of and above the
level of Under Secretary in the Ministry of Rural Development, Government of
India and such officer as may be authorized by the State Government may also
inspect the accounts.
iv) A
Statement showing the schedule of Fixed Assets held by the DRDA / Agency at the
end of the financial year should be sent to the State Government and Government
of India with the form prescribed alongwith the
annual statement of accounts. No depreciation should be charged and value of
assets to be shown at the original cost in the accounts.
v) All the Agencies should
send a utilization certificate to the Government of India (Department of Rural
Development) in the prescribed Performa alongwith
annual statement of accounts. The utilization certificate must be prepared
strictly on the basis of the Receipts and Payment Accounts and opening / closing
balances in both Receipts and Payment Accounts Utilisation
Certificate must also tally.
vi) The
above provisions are in addition to the statutory requirements under relevant
law under which the DRDAs are registered.
home